Why are Internet propagandists for Russian Intelligence (KGB/FSB) blaming the US Navy for diverting and capturing the missing Malaysian Jet? Are they trying to ‘cover their fingerprints’?
I find it very interesting that the ‘mysterious’ disappearance of the Malaysian Jet has distracted the media attention away from Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine and their new nuclear deal with Iran. Why are the Russians rewarding a terrorist regime like Iran that has been linked to the 9/11 attacks by a Federal Judge?
It isn’t rocket science folks!
Nothing this calculated like hijacking a massive airliner takes place unless it is State Sponsored like 9/11 was, but the media never reports about the Iranian connection to 9/11. Why is that? The Democrat media is siding with Russia and Iran; enemies of Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden and the Iranians used Sunni, Saudi Arabian hijackers to frame them for the 9/11 attacks. After all, it would be stupid of Iran to use Iranian hijackers for 9/11, because they would be blamed. So, they pointed the blame towards the Saudi’s, their mortal enemy. Very clever!
Today’s update from Malaysian Authorities is that ‘the plane was intentionally diverted’
Here is the first paragraph of the article from that Russian ‘conspiracy website’.
A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU) states that Aerospace Defence Forces (VKO) experts remain “puzzled” as to why the United States Navy “captured and then diverted” a Malaysia Airlines civilian aircraft from its intended flight-path to their vast and highly-secretive Indian Ocean base located on the Diego Garcia atoll.
The blogger that wrote this article “Interventionists Attempt to Isolate Rand Paul Over Iran Deal” came up with some creative words to hide the ‘Liberal propaganda’ that he is really spewing to defend Iran.
Interventionists? More like Patriots that know Iran was linked to the 9/11/01 attack, but Liberals and Libertarians are knowingly defending the enemy. This is treason. ‘Iran Paul’ has access to the intelligence and so does Obama; yet they continue to defend Iran. Why? This is what the Kremlin desires. Paul and Obama are really left wingers that know to follow Moscow’s lead when it comes to foreign policy.
Iran’s link to terrorism is well documented, but is IGNORED by Liberals and Libertarians since they know Iran is acting as a proxy of Russia to attack Capitalism with.
Notice that Rand Paul and Obama are BOTH against tough Iran sanctions? The reason is they are BOTH Left Wingers. Libertarians like ‘Iran Paul’ talk conservative on the economy to bait conservatives into buying the rest of his ‘talking points’ such as defending Iran.
At The American Conservative, W. James Antle III has a shrewd, pessimistic take on how GOP opposition to the Iran nuclear deal threatens to isolate intervention-skeptic Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky):
Why would Liberals try to undermine the success of the movie Lone Survivor? Liberals are traitors that have contributed to the deaths of US Troops during Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan due to their support for the enemy. Libertarians were right there next to Liberals protesting against George Bush, screaming about torture and so on.
Liberals undermine ALL wars, because they believe the only way to achieve peace is through surrender. This is why they always say “We need to find a political solution”. Karl Marx said “The meaning of peace is absence to resistance to Socialism”. This is what 9/11 was really about. To attack Capitalism and to end the resistance to Socialism. The Socialists hired Muslims to do their dirty work for them. Yes, they are cowards, but they are also traitors.
Here is Rich Lowry’s editorial from the NY Post on why Liberals hate Lone Survivor:
The movie “Lone Survivor” didn’t get any major Oscar nominations, but perhaps it should’ve been nominated for Most Unlikely Politically Incorrect Picture of the Year.
Bill O’ Reilly seems to protect Hillary Clinton in this segment and he has done so in the past as well. O’ Reilly landed an interview with Bill Clinton once before so maybe he is trying to use kid gloves on Hillary so he can score her as well. This is about EGO.
Bill Clinton, Obama or John Kerry would never go on the Sean Hannity show, because they fear him unlike Mr. ‘fair and balanced’ Bill O’ Reilly.
Bill mentions Susan Rice and the ‘video conspiracy theory’ during the Bengazi segment, but he never mentions her boss Hillary Clinton. The State Dept is in charge of security of Ambassadors abroad; therefore Benghazi needs to be placed on Hillary’s lap.
Susan Rice answers to and works directly under Hillary Clinton since she was Sec. of State. So, everything else is just a distraction.
ONE MORE THING, Why was the US Military unprepared for security in the region on the anniversary of 9/11? Especially since Ambassador Stevens was worried about security in the past.
ALSO, only the President can declassify documents. Why did Obama declassify these documents about Benghazi this past week? I suspect that he wants to keep this distraction alive and to haunt Hillary Clinton. I believe Bill O’ Reilly knows this and he was trying to protect Hillary Clinton.