Hillary Clinton FLASHBACK: Saddam aided Al Qaeda terrorists (2002)


Conservative News Update:

What difference does it make?

The Democrats voted for the Iraq War and then they undermined US Troops after their boots hit the ground. Leftists use Hillary’s Iraq War vote as a reason to hate her, but there are many other reasons as well. She just isn’t radical enough for these extremists that would rather have an Obama Dictatorship.

Also, check out the new Hillary “Benghazi” Clinton Facebook Page

Al Qaeda linked forces capture town of Fallujah in Iraq



Conservative News Update:

Al Qaeda is taking over Iraq? That really means IRAN is taking over Iraq.

Obama surrendered to Iran (and Moscow) when he withdrew US Troops from Iraq. All of the American blood that spilled was for nothing, because every gain in Iraq has been lost. Al Qaeda probably already has training camps all over Iraq as US Troops are watching cable TV in Afghanistan.

Elections have consequences….

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/03/22166297-al-qaeda-linked-forces-capture-town-of-fallujah-in-iraq?lite

Congressman: NY Times Benghazi report is ‘misleading’


Conservative News Update:

 

Didn’t the NY Times get the memo from Hillary Clinton? “What difference does it make?

I am curious who buys their papers since everyone gets their news from the Internet now for free.

What if Iran or Moscow made a deal to buy 100,000 papers per month for stories that would be in their favor? That would be a great way to buy slanted news stories to protect their terrorist proxies. “What difference does it make?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/28/gop-congressman-blasts-ny-times-benghazi-claims-as-misleading/

Thoughts about Jimmy Carter & CIA Involvement during the Soviet-Afghan War



Conservative News Update:  

Something about the Soviet-Afghan War just doesn’t sit right with me; especially since there is very little information about what really happened. Libertarians love to use the propaganda that the “CIA created Al Qaeda; when in fact they really created the Mujahadeen”.

Liberals love to cleanse and re-write history ‘especially’ when it comes to Communism and the Soviets. Liberal historians make Hitler and Fascism the bad guy, because that is used as a distraction from the atrocities of Communism. This is clever deception.

So history says that the CIA withdrew from Afghanistan after the Soviets withdrew their troops. Well, many believe that the Russian KGB stayed and continued to have influence in Afghanistan over the Muslim war lords after the CIA and Soviet Troops left the war torn country.

The Muslims now needed a new enemy to target since the Soviets withdrew their troops. So, did Bin Laden switch sides and decide to work for the Soviets and target the U.S. after the Soviet-Afghan war ended? Some think so and I am one of them.

Bin Laden did kill an Al Qaeda leader that wanted to target Israel instead of the U.S., but his name escapes me at this time. Who gave Bin Laden the order to kill that Al Qaeda leader and attack the U.S.? Was it the Kremlin?

Does this ‘conspiracy theory’ sound off the wall? Well, it isn’t if you understand there is no loyalty among these terrorists. The enemy of their enemy is seen as their friend. Most ‘conspiracy theories’ wind up being real conspiracies if you can look outside of the small box of media lies.

Libertarians become silent once it is mentioned that the new Al Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri was trained by the Russians in the late 90′s according to ‘DEAD’ FSB Agent Alexander Litvinenko.

There is much more to this ‘conspiracy theory’ than you believe.

Is Al Qaeda a Kremlin Proxy?

Al Qaeda Archives

Sept 11th Archives

 

Obama and Clapper blame Bush for the NSA program?


Conservative News Update:

Reported by Russia Today:

President Barack Obama’s administration has for the first time publicly confirmed “the existence of collection activities authorized by President George W. Bush,” such as bulk amounts of Internet and phone metadata, as part of the “Terrorist Surveillance Program” (TSP).

http://rt.com/usa/bush-nsa-spying-clapper-632/

ALSO – How U.S. eavesdropping helped Colombia kill Marxist FARC Terrorist leaders

Why did the media change the Democrats color from ‘red to blue’ after the 2000 Presidential Election?


Conservative News Update:

A while back, I thought about why the Democrats are associated with the color ‘blue’ since they support Socialism & Communism. Parties that support Socialism and Communism are typically associated with the color ‘red’ and Conservative’s are associated with the color ‘blue’.

I then found out that the colors were changed after the 2000 Presidential Election. Now, isn’t that convenient? This is clearly deception by the media to make people think of the color ‘blue’ instead of ‘red’ when they think of the Democrats. The goal is to prevent the American people from associating the Democrats with Communists.

There is no need to be covert? We know the TRUTH!

The Democrats clearly knew that Communism was playing possum and that an offensive was going to be executed against Capitalism. Would that offensive be the 9/11 attacks since Al Qaeda struck the World Trade Center known as the ‘heart of the U.S. Financial System’? Who does Al Qaeda really work for? I find it interesting that this change was made the year before the Sept 11th, 2001 attacks.

According to Wikipedia:

Before the 2000 presidential election, the traditional color-coding scheme was “Blue for Republican, Red for Democrat.

This terminology came into use in the United States presidential election of 2000 on an episode of the Today show on October 30, 2000. According to AlterNet and The Washington Post, the terms were coined by journalist Tim Russert, during his televised coverage of the 2000 presidential election.[1]

Since 2000, usage of the term has been expanded to differentiate between states being perceived as liberal and those perceived as conservative. This reverses a long-standing convention, where the red symbols (such as the Red Flag or Red Star) are associated with Socialist and revolutionary movements, and conservative movements often choose blue as a contrasting color.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states#Origins_of_the_color_scheme

Posted from WordPress for Android

Liberals push to blame Saudi Arabia for 9/11 despite Federal Judge linking Iran to the attacks


Conservative News Update:

 

There is a desperate battle on the Internet by Liberals and Libertarians to blame the Saudi’s for all terrorism as they act as a ‘human shield’ for the Moscow backed Iranian terrorists that have killed American citizens and Troops for over three decades.

There is a big push to blame Saudi Arabia for the 9/11 attacks, because once again Liberals and their Islamic terrorist pals are trying to cleanse history. YES, the Saudi’s were linked to Al Qaeda before the 9/11 attacks, but Iran was linked to the 9/11 hijackers. That is the difference.

Very few websites or news organizations report about the Iranian link to terrorism, Al Qaeda and 9/11 due to the massive amount of counter propaganda to undermine these claims. The far Left and Muslims that back Iran are united to blame the Saudi Government.

I am not claiming that the Saudi’s are angels. I allege that that Bin Laden conspired with the Iranians to frame the Saudi’s for 9/11 by using mainly Saudi hijackers for the attacks. It was no secret that Bin Laden had declared war against the Saudi Royal family. So, none of this is surprising to anyone that knows ALL of the facts. The deception behind these attacks were brilliant and the Democrat controlled media is guilty of suppressing the truth about the 9/11 attacks.

The Saudi link to terrorism and Al Qaeda is there just as much as the Iranian link. There have been many countries linked to aiding Al Qaeda. Ayman Zawahiri was trained in Russia according to Alexander Litvinenko the former KGB agent that was poisoned with Polonium radiation.

There have been many reports in the past of Al Qaeda terrorists being trained by Hezbollah terrorists. Hezbollah is a terror group that is backed by the Iranian Government. The leader of Hezbollah helped escort the 9/11 hijackers to Afghanistan via Iran. This was reported in the 9/11 Commission Report. Even radical Leftist, Bill Maher has stated that Iran was behind 9/11 on his talk show. How does he knows this? He obviously read the 9/11 Report. It is no secret.

Why were the families of the 9/11 conspirators hiding in Iran after the attacks? The Iranian Government claimed that they were under ‘house arrest’, but that wasn’t the case. I don’t believe the reports that Iran held Bin Laden’s son in law as a ‘bargaining chip’.  No, they were accomplices.

One Iranian official, former U.N. ambassador Javad Zarif, told NBC News in the mid-2000s that “no nation has captured as many al-Qaida members as Iran.” – Link

Did Iran capture terrorists or were they really accomplices?

U.S. Military leaders have testified in front of Congress countless times during the peak of the Iraq War to allege that Iran was aiding Al Qaeda terrorists fighting U.S. Troops in Iraq. Syria was also assisted with training terrorists to fight the U.S. as well. This is all old news, but it is forgotten as well. The Liberal media has cleansed these facts from the minds of the American people. Repeating the words “Never Forget” is the only thing the American people are allowed to associate with the terror attacks.

The 9/11 Truther movement did a great job confusing people from seeing who the real culprits of 9/11 was on the Internet during the ‘Bush years’. They blamed everyone from George Bush to the Israeli’s. Even Leftist Michael Moore got in on the action with his comments and Documentary on 9/11.

There is a desperate battle on the Internet by Liberals and Libertarians to blame the Saudi’s for all terrorism as they act as a ‘human shield’ for the Moscow backed Iranian terrorists that have killed American citizens and Troops for over three decades.

US Federal Judge links Iran to Al Qaeda and the 9/11 attacks

Iranian media reports about the Saudi link to 9/11