Conservative News Update:
The Washington Post praised Bill O’ Reilly’s Super Bowl Sunday interview with Obama, but what did it accomplish? Bill O’ Reilly didn’t find out ‘who told Susan Rice to go on the Sunday talk shows to blame Benghazi on a You Tube video’.
O’ Reilly could have pressed one question, but instead he just vomited everything and got nothing in return. This tough interview ‘for the folks’ was more like a staged Professional Wrestling match between Hulk Hogan and the scrub of the month. Obama was Hogan and Bill O’ was the scrub.
Here is how a Sean Hannity interview with Obama would have went on Benghazi:
Sean Hannity would have pressed Obama to ‘name names’ in regards to Susan Rice and her Benghazi fairy tale. Obama would have blamed the You Tube story on the ‘Intelligence Community’. Hannity than would have asked “the CIA”? Who exactly was that person? and Obama would have said “I can’t say”. Why? Obama won’t answer, because it is another lie.
My example above is the reason why Bill O’ Reilly was chosen to interview Obama instead of Sean Hannity. The Washington Post would have attacked Sean Hannity if he interviewed Obama, because he would have been much more aggressive. Hannity would have been labeled is ‘disrespectful’.
Bill O’ Reilly has been ALLOWED to interview Obama 3 times for a reason, because he puts on a good show. It’s WWF in suits.