Tag Archives: 9/11

9/11 Theory: Was the Kremlin afraid of George Bush expanding NATO into the Former Soviet Republics?

Conservative News Update:

I had an interesting conversation with a man from the former Soviet Republic of Georgia this morning. He said “the US needs to protect Georgia and the Ukraine from a Russian invasion”. I told him: “Well, I would agree with you if Obama wasn’t the President, but he is in bed with Putin. They already have made a deal”.

He agreed that Obama can’t be trusted. He also agreed with my theory that Russia was involved with 9/11 (via Iran) as retaliation for GW Bush trying to expand NATO into the former Soviet Republics.

I am the only analyst on the Internet to link the expansion of NATO with 9/11. I will be proven correct one day, but the truth is being hidden. In the summer of 2001, George Bush gave a speech about Georgia and the Ukraine joining NATO.

Well, 3 months later 9/11 happened and those Republics never joined NATO ever since.  Now, Putin wants those former Soviet Republics back and that shows how ticked off he was at George Bush  after that June 2001 speech. 9/11 was a message from the Kremlin to Washington to “stay away from the former Republics”. 

The Russians rewarded Iran by building all of those lovely nuclear plants for them.  This is how I see it…  

MORE

US Seizes Iran assets in New York to pay 9/11 families

Conservative News Update:

Iran killed over 3,000 people on 9/11 and it only cost them real estate? Iran’s connection to the 9/11 attacks is buried by the media and the US Government.

Useful idiots such as Obama, Ron and Rand Paul are Iran’s biggest defenders, but they know exactly what they are guilty of.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/17/us-says-forfeiture-over-iran-assets-in-new-york-elsewhere-will-be-record-terror/

 

Iran supporting future Afghan gov’t: Official

Conservative News Update:

Obama surrendered in Iraq and now Afghanistan to Iran. Any US Military veteran that voted for Obama should be ashamed of themselves, because they have betrayed their fallen comrades that spilled blood after 9/11.

Iran got away with 9/11 untouched and they are laughing in our faces.  Many people look at me like I am crazy when I connect Iran to 9/11, but they are just brainwashed fools.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2014/04/07/357524/iran-backing-future-afghan-govt/

Rare video footage from the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center

Left Wingers defend ‘Iran Paul’ (Rand Paul) on Sanctions

Conservative News Update:

The blogger that wrote this article “Interventionists Attempt to Isolate Rand Paul Over Iran Deal” came up with some creative words to hide the ‘Liberal propaganda’ that he is really spewing to defend Iran.

Interventionists? More like Patriots that know Iran was linked to the 9/11/01 attack, but Liberals and Libertarians are knowingly defending the enemy. This is treason. ‘Iran Paul’ has access to the intelligence and so does Obama; yet they continue to defend Iran. Why? This is what the Kremlin desires. Paul and Obama are really left wingers that know to follow Moscow’s lead when it comes to foreign policy.

Iran’s link to terrorism is well documented, but is IGNORED by Liberals and Libertarians since they know Iran is acting as a proxy of Russia to attack Capitalism with.

Notice that Rand Paul and Obama are BOTH against tough Iran sanctions? The reason is they are BOTH Left Wingers. Libertarians like ‘Iran Paul’ talk conservative on the economy to bait conservatives into buying the rest of his ‘talking points’ such as defending Iran.

At The American Conservative, W. James Antle III has a shrewd, pessimistic take on how GOP opposition to the Iran nuclear deal threatens to isolate intervention-skeptic Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky):

http://reason.com/blog/2013/11/25/interventionists-attempt-to-isolate-rand

Congressman: NY Times Benghazi report is ‘misleading’


Conservative News Update:

 

Didn’t the NY Times get the memo from Hillary Clinton? “What difference does it make?

I am curious who buys their papers since everyone gets their news from the Internet now for free.

What if Iran or Moscow made a deal to buy 100,000 papers per month for stories that would be in their favor? That would be a great way to buy slanted news stories to protect their terrorist proxies. “What difference does it make?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/28/gop-congressman-blasts-ny-times-benghazi-claims-as-misleading/

Why did the media change the Democrats color from ‘red to blue’ after the 2000 Presidential Election?


Conservative News Update:

A while back, I thought about why the Democrats are associated with the color ‘blue’ since they support Socialism & Communism. Parties that support Socialism and Communism are typically associated with the color ‘red’ and Conservative’s are associated with the color ‘blue’.

I then found out that the colors were changed after the 2000 Presidential Election. Now, isn’t that convenient? This is clearly deception by the media to make people think of the color ‘blue’ instead of ‘red’ when they think of the Democrats. The goal is to prevent the American people from associating the Democrats with Communists.

There is no need to be covert? We know the TRUTH!

The Democrats clearly knew that Communism was playing possum and that an offensive was going to be executed against Capitalism. Would that offensive be the 9/11 attacks since Al Qaeda struck the World Trade Center known as the ‘heart of the U.S. Financial System’? Who does Al Qaeda really work for? I find it interesting that this change was made the year before the Sept 11th, 2001 attacks.

According to Wikipedia:

Before the 2000 presidential election, the traditional color-coding scheme was “Blue for Republican, Red for Democrat.

This terminology came into use in the United States presidential election of 2000 on an episode of the Today show on October 30, 2000. According to AlterNet and The Washington Post, the terms were coined by journalist Tim Russert, during his televised coverage of the 2000 presidential election.[1]

Since 2000, usage of the term has been expanded to differentiate between states being perceived as liberal and those perceived as conservative. This reverses a long-standing convention, where the red symbols (such as the Red Flag or Red Star) are associated with Socialist and revolutionary movements, and conservative movements often choose blue as a contrasting color.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states#Origins_of_the_color_scheme

Posted from WordPress for Android