Russia was clearly upset with Hillary Clinton during the Spring/Summer of 2012 about weapons supplies to Syria.
What better way is there to get even with Hillary Clinton other than calling for the death of her Ambassador, tarnishing her reign as Secretary of State.
Notice that article by the UK Telegraph was playing up the feud between the Russians and Hillary Clinton’s State Dept? This was just 3 months before the 9/11 attacks on Libya. I added more links at the end of this editorial.
Why would the Russians hire Muslims for the Benghazi attack? They weren’t happy about weapons being smuggled to the Syrian rebels by Amb Stevens. The feud between Russia and Hillary Clinton during the summer of 2012 is DOCUMENTED. This is my theory.
Rand Paul mentioned ”weapons smuggling’ to Hillary and she pretended that she didn’t now what he was saying. I believe that it was the CIA doing it and it was CLASSIFIED. Libertarians are tools of Moscow and my radar went off when Rand Paul started pushing this issue about weapons being funneled (allegedly by Amb Stevens).
Hillary Clinton’s answer to Rand Paul was “You will have to take up that question (about weapons shipments) with the AGENCY (CIA) that ran the annex”.
Clinton followed up by saying: “I have to see what information is AVAILABLE (meaning classified)”.
Hillary Clinton acted dumbfounded when Rand Paul brought this up during a public hearing and then referred the Senator to the CIA, because this was clearly classified information.
A ton of news results will come up if you do a Google search for news article regarding “Russia weapons Libya Syria” for the summer of 2012. The Russians were making it known that they were supplying Assad’s regime, because they suspected that the CIA was supplying the Syrian rebels.
The Russian Government was making it known via their controlled media that they were ‘not pleased’ with the CIA supplying weapons to the Syrian rebels.
I suspect that the attack on the US Embassy (by hiring Muslim bandits) and the killing of Ambassador Stevens was a way for Moscow to get the message across to Hillary Clinton and the CIA to stop the flow of weapons into Syria from Libya via Turkey.
Why did Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice cover up the Benghazi attack by claiming it was a protest over a You Tube video?
Partly embarrassment and political correctness, but also I believe to cover up the possible Russian involvement with the death of a US Ambassador and others via a hired Muslim posse. The Russians just have to pick up the phone and call their Iranian pals to get this done and I believe this is how it played out.
This is why there are parts of the 9/11 Benghazi report that are classified…SUSPECTED Russian involvement.
I warned everyone that it was a false flag to start a much bigger conflict between NATO and Russia when Syria shot down that Turkish fighter jet about two months ago. I know what is on their minds before they do it.
I have been following Douglas Hagmann’s work for several years now. His investigation and sources are always on the cutting edge. I believe every word that he printed in this article.
Hagmann states that the Russians compromised a mission that Ambassador Stevens and the Navy Seals were involved with as far as rounding up weapons in Libya and shipping them to the Syrian rebels to fight against the Russian backed Syrian Government.
The article claims that the Russians took satellite images of ‘activity’ in Turkey near the border with Syria. Was this why Ambassador Stevens was in danger of being killed by Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda is a terrorist group that the Russians, Syrians and Iranians use against the USA. I hate to break the news to you sheep, but the USA is not fighting a barefoot Muslim in a cave. This is a proxy war against an ‘Axis of Evil’.
It is reasonable to suspect that these activities were more dire than just your average “gun running” operation. Since the overthrow of Qaddafi, it is estimated that upwards of 40 million tons of weapons and arms were shipped out of Libya to Syria. But it was also known inside intelligence circles that Qaddafi possessed chemical weapons in addition to numerous surface to air missiles.
Could it be that Russia obtained unmistakable surveillance footage of the anti-Assad “rebels” being shown how to load chemical payloads onto missiles inside Turkey near the border of Syria? Weapons, of course, that were shipped from Libya by the CIA in conjunction with various Muslim Brotherhood rebel groups.
If so, such weapons could be used as a “false flag” type of operation – one that would be implemented to “set-up” Assad by making it appear that he was using these weapons on forces dedicated to his overthrow.
Was this hit against Ambassador Stevens sanctioned by Moscow and that is why Obama is covering it up? I guess that he doesn’t want the “Russian Reset” to be exposed as a failure.
Hagmann also mentions the massive nuclear missile test that Russia did around October 21, 2012 towards the end of the article. He claims that this was a strong message from Putin that WW III will be started if their terror proxy, Syria is attacked by NATO.Here is the link that I posted on The Conservative Monster.com - Russian Nuclear Test is a Pre-Election Message to the USA to Vote for Obama?