Why would Liberals try to undermine the success of the movie Lone Survivor? Liberals are traitors that have contributed to the deaths of US Troops during Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan due to their support for the enemy. Libertarians were right there next to Liberals protesting against George Bush, screaming about torture and so on.
Liberals undermine ALL wars, because they believe the only way to achieve peace is through surrender. This is why they always say “We need to find a political solution”. Karl Marx said “The meaning of peace is absence to resistance to Socialism”. This is what 9/11 was really about. To attack Capitalism and to end the resistance to Socialism. The Socialists hired Muslims to do their dirty work for them. Yes, they are cowards, but they are also traitors.
Here is Rich Lowry’s editorial from the NY Post on why Liberals hate Lone Survivor:
The movie “Lone Survivor” didn’t get any major Oscar nominations, but perhaps it should’ve been nominated for Most Unlikely Politically Incorrect Picture of the Year.
Al Qaeda is taking over Iraq? That really means IRAN is taking over Iraq.
Obama surrendered to Iran (and Moscow) when he withdrew US Troops from Iraq. All of the American blood that spilled was for nothing, because every gain in Iraq has been lost. Al Qaeda probably already has training camps all over Iraq as US Troops are watching cable TV in Afghanistan.
Something about the Soviet-Afghan War just doesn’t sit right with me; especially since there is very little information about what really happened. Libertarians love to use the propaganda that the “CIA created Al Qaeda; when in fact they really created the Mujahadeen”.
Liberals love to cleanse and re-write history ‘especially’ when it comes to Communism and the Soviets. Liberal historians make Hitler and Fascism the bad guy, because that is used as a distraction from the atrocities of Communism. This is clever deception.
So history says that the CIA withdrew from Afghanistan after the Soviets withdrew their troops. Well, many believe that the Russian KGB stayed and continued to have influence in Afghanistan over the Muslim war lords after the CIA and Soviet Troops left the war torn country.
The Muslims now needed a new enemy to target since the Soviets withdrew their troops. So, did Bin Laden switch sides and decide to work for the Soviets and target the U.S. after the Soviet-Afghan war ended? Some think so and I am one of them.
Bin Laden did kill an Al Qaeda leader that wanted to target Israel instead of the U.S., but his name escapes me at this time. Who gave Bin Laden the order to kill that Al Qaeda leader and attack the U.S.? Was it the Kremlin?
Does this ‘conspiracy theory’ sound off the wall? Well, it isn’t if you understand there is no loyalty among these terrorists. The enemy of their enemy is seen as their friend. Most ‘conspiracy theories’ wind up being real conspiracies if you can look outside of the small box of media lies.
Libertarians become silent once it is mentioned that the new Al Qaeda leader Ayman Zawahiri was trained by the Russians in the late 90’s according to ‘DEAD’ FSB Agent Alexander Litvinenko.
There is much more to this ‘conspiracy theory’ than you believe.
The retired Army Captain claims that his superior officers might have been worried about civilian casualties. Of course terrorists breed children and then they surround themselves with those children to use as human shields.
These little ‘human shields’ are future terrorists anyway.
Coward Liberals are controlling life and death situations on the battle field. I had the depth of insight to see this back when I was 19 (in the early 80’s)and thinking about joining the USMC. I decided against it, because I saw traitors like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry were running the show.
These wars would have been over long ago if I were running the show, because Iran would have been erased from the map. Leftists that complained would have been sent to Gitmo with their Muslim terrorist pals.